Well science does take a lot of time I’m afraid, it can take years to get to the bottom of a problem. But in work terms I think it’s OK. I work about 40-45 hours most weeks and although if you think lots of jobs are 9-5 (37 hours a week roughly), lots of people take work home. Whether it’s tecahers taking marking home, or people taking paper-work home.
You do get people who regularly spend 60 hrs or more in the lab and just don’t have a life outside of work, but we’re not forced to do that, and to be honest I think a lot of those people just get so tired and exhausted that they end up being really inefficient making lots more mistakes.
On computer I probably spedn around 2-3 hrs per day – reading work other people have published online, reading emails, researching other information, searching databases, making powerpoints for talks.
Hi, I usually manage to fit all of my work in 9-5 monday to friday so I suppose it doesnt take too much time. Right now I am spending loads of time on the computer in this ‘Im a scientist’ but I usually only check emails, find journals in science, and occasionally check facebook. I also have a few coffee breaks in the day and time for lunch (although in this time I am also keeping an eye on my experiment)
My work takes too much time. One problem scientists have is, the more experienced they get the more management and teaching they do, which means less time in the lab. I used to spend on average 5-6 hours a day in the lab – now it’s more like 1-3 hours.
I never really seem to have enough time to do everything I would like to so I suppose in that sense it takes too much time, But it doesn’t stop me from doing other things. I do spend alot of my day on the computer as that is how I find the information and journal papers that I need and then of course I have to write my findings up. But when I’m doing interviews for my PhD I get out of the office and away from my computer to talk to scientists at other universities and organisations which is great.
Comments