I think they’re pretty even because Pasteur was concerned with vaccination and Lister was looking at anteseptic so both extremely important. Maybe Pasteur might just edge it as his pasturisation technique to stop milk and wine causing illness may have benefitted more people overall.
I believe an Austrian surgeon discovered the advantages of sterilising surgical instruments before Lister, but was tragically ignored.
Pasteur contributed to leaps in understanding and theory in chemistry and microbiology, as well as practical things like effective sterilisation of wine and milk.
This is a difficult question to answer, however regarding the development of the germ theory of disease perhaps I would argue that Louis Pasteur was more influential as although Joseph Listers had observed that covering wounds after surgery was beneficial, it was only after Louis Pasteur suggested that decay was caused by living organisms in the air, which on entering matter caused it to ferment (in 1865) that Lister then made the connection with wound sepsis.
I would say Pasteur too, because most of Lister’s antiseptic work was based on Pasteur’s work, so without Pasteur’s work. Lister wouldn’t have been able to go as far as he did.
Comments
stephanie commented on :
I would say Pasteur too, because most of Lister’s antiseptic work was based on Pasteur’s work, so without Pasteur’s work. Lister wouldn’t have been able to go as far as he did.